From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933185AbdDFAbQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 20:31:16 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]:38369 "EHLO mail-it0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752503AbdDFAbL (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 20:31:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:31:05 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Mike Galbraith Cc: netdev , LKML , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Message-ID: <20170405173105.7f41d7fc@plumbers-lap.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <1491107321.13631.33.camel@gmx.de> References: <1491107321.13631.33.camel@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 06:28:41 +0200 Mike Galbraith wrote: > Livelock can be triggered by setting kworkers to SCHED_FIFO, then > suspend/resume.. you come back from sleepy-land with a spinning > kworker. For whatever reason, I can only do that with an enterprise > like config, my standard config refuses to play, but no matter, it's > "Typical broken usage". > > (yield() should be rendered dead) The kernel is not normally built to have kworkers run at SCHED_FIFO. The user has do some action to alter the process priorities. I classify this as user error. We don't support killing kworker threads either.