Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code

mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	broonie@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:14:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170406141402.GJ9429@e106622-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170327131825.32134-1-juri.lelli@arm.com>

Hi,

On 27/03/17 14:18, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> arm and arm64 topology.c share a lot of code related to parsing of capacity
> information. This is v3 of a solution [1] (based on Will's, Catalin's and
> Mark's off-line suggestions) to move such common code in a single place:
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c (by creating such file and conditionally compiling
> it for arm and arm64 only).
> 
> First 4 patches are actually fixes for the current code.
> 
> Patch 5 is the actual refactoring.
> 
> Patch 6 is a minor change suggested by Greg and can be squashed as needed.
> 
> Patch 7 removes one of the extern symbols by changing a bit the now common
> code.
> 
> Patch 8 removes the remaining externs (as required by Russell during v1 review)
> by creating a new header file include/linux/arch_topology.h and including that
> from arm, arm64 and drivers.
> 
> Last patch addresses Dietmar's comments to v1 and adds a 'atd_' prefix to
> interfaces exported by drivers code and used by arch (and potentially others in
> the future).
> 
> Changes from v2:
> 
>  - rebase on top of 4.11-rc4
>  - fix various problems pointed out by Greg, thanks for the review!
>    (see patch 5 for details)
> 

Thanks Vincent for your comments.

Everybody else, ping?

Thanks,

- Juri

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-06 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-27 13:18 Juri Lelli
2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] Documentation: arm: fix wrong reference number in DT definition Juri Lelli
2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] Documentation/ABI: add information about cpu_capacity Juri Lelli
2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] arm: fix return value of parse_cpu_capacity Juri Lelli
2017-03-29  7:37   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-03-29  8:06     ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] arm: remove wrong CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL ifdef Juri Lelli
2017-03-29  7:39   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] arm, arm64: factorize common cpu capacity default code Juri Lelli
2017-04-08 16:25   ` Greg KH
2017-04-10  8:18   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-10 16:23     ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] drivers: remove useless comment from base/arch_topology.c Juri Lelli
2017-04-10 13:51   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-10 14:02     ` Juri Lelli
2017-04-10 16:33       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-11 10:43         ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] arm,arm64,drivers: reduce scope of cap_parsing_failed Juri Lelli
2017-04-10  8:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] arm,arm64,drivers: move externs in a new header file Juri Lelli
2017-04-10  8:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-03-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] arm,arm64,drivers: add a prefix to drivers arch_topology interfaces Juri Lelli
2017-04-10  8:32   ` [PATCH v3 9/9] arm, arm64, drivers: " Catalin Marinas
2017-04-06 14:14 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-04-10 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-10 16:21   ` Juri Lelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170406141402.GJ9429@e106622-lin \
    --to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome