From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755853AbdDGKtU (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:49:20 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:36801 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932598AbdDGKss (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:48:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:48:46 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Linus Walleij Cc: Ludovic Desroches , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91-pio4: handle suspend to ram Message-ID: <20170407104846.5ghrcqc2ws4dkqxt@piout.net> References: <20170406133623.19160-1-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/04/2017 at 12:16:22 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Alexandre Belloni > wrote: > > > When suspending to RAM, the power to the core is cut and the register > > values are lost. Save and restore more registers than just IMR. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > > Should this be tagged for stable? > No because that particular suspend to ram mode is not yet implemented upstream. > Waiting for input from the AT91 maintainers here. > Well, I've been an AT91 maintainer for 2 years now and I have done all the AT91 pull requests since 3.16. I hope this qualifies me here. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com