From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752489AbdDKRjg (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:39:36 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:33876 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751620AbdDKRje (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:39:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:39:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20170411.133931.1833156329944802565.davem@davemloft.net> To: pasha.tatashin@oracle.com Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, babu.moger@oracle.com Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the sparc tree From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20170329163746.5f4df976@canb.auug.org.au> <20170328.224329.923677797060723333.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Pasha Tatashin Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:27:38 -0400 > Should I send this change to sparc ml for discussion? It's in the review pile on patchwork, there is nothing more for you to do other than to be patient.