mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Have do_idle() call __schedule() without enabling preemption
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:21:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170412162157.ukmhksytgrc2qx2e@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170412104124.4639c8ff@gandalf.local.home>

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:24AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [ tl;dr; version ]
> 
> Peter, In order to have synchronize_rcu_tasks() work, the idle task can
> never be preempted. There's a very small window in
> schedule_preempt_disable() that enables preemption, and when this
> happens, it breaks synchronize_rcu_tasks() (see above email for
> details).
> 
> Is there any reason to enable preemption, or can we simply have idle
> call into schedule without ever allowing it to be preempted, as in my
> patch?

Dunno,.. this changelog should convince me, not make me do the work :-)

> Note, it is almost good enough to just change
> schedule_preempt_disable() to do the exact same thing, but there's one
> instance in kernel/locking/mutex.c that calls it in a non running state.

The point being that that must not happen because of
sched_submit_work(), which, for idle, should not matter.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-12 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-12  2:44 Steven Rostedt
2017-04-12 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-12 16:21   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-04-12 16:43     ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170412162157.ukmhksytgrc2qx2e@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®