From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759744AbdDSJuL (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:50:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:35241 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751583AbdDSJuH (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:50:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:50:02 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Xishi Qiu , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , the arch/x86 maintainers , wanpeng li , Andrew Morton , hidehiro kawai ez , LKML , Fengtiantian , Xiexiuqi Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] x86: call smp vmxoff in smp stop Message-ID: <20170419095002.n2m6hsehfy2hzscn@gmail.com> References: <586CCA5A.8050607@huawei.com> <586DA529.1040803@huawei.com> <58798201.2@huawei.com> <587F523B.80301@huawei.com> <3d5bf4c2-7415-a976-62fb-ba653f92eada@redhat.com> <20170419080254.c3j5lwztad2fswwr@gmail.com> <393949858.14449581.1492590121377.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <393949858.14449581.1492590121377.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > On 18/01/2017 12:32, Xishi Qiu wrote: > > > > From: Tiantian Feng > > > > > > > > We need to disable VMX on all CPUs before stop cpu when OS panic, > > > > otherwisewe risk hanging up the machine, because the CPU ignore INIT > > > > signals when VMX is enabled. In kernel mainline this issue existence. > > > > Yes, but the changelog is atrcious: > > > > - title should describe the purpose, not the implementation > > > > - CPU is spelled 'CPU' once, then 'cpu' _in the same sentence_! > > > > - typos > > > > - spelling > > > > - the last sentence doesn't even parse ... > > > > Still it's already at V4 and comes with two signoffs and what amounts to a > > maintainer Ack?? > > Well, the v2-v4 were really just about getting the signoffs right. At some > point you just get desensitized about the changelog. :( > > I'll post v5 with a rewritten commit message. Thanks! Ingo