From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751355AbdEBRoz (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2017 13:44:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:33639 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751064AbdEBRox (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2017 13:44:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 19:44:48 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, javier@dowhile0.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as reviewer for Exynos Message-ID: <20170502174448.hk4mn4udfmmkdwv7@kozik-lap> References: <20170428140107.14491-1-shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170428140107.14491-1-shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:01:07AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > Adding myself as a reviewer for Exynos in the interest of keeping an > eye on the Exynos platform and help keep it stable. > > Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Dear Shuah, Thank you for the idea. Review and testing is always welcomed and much appreciated. The entry in maintainers file is a little bit different than just reviewing as that could be done also on mailing lists. Such reviewer should be partially responsible for the Exynos ARM architecture and even backup or replace maintainers. Quite frankly I must admit that I am surprised because so far I did not see any contributions or reviews from you before around Exynos SoC code, except recently media (which is separate and not covered by me). Best regards, Krzysztof