From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752711AbdEEHsj (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 03:48:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:37248 "EHLO mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751180AbdEEHsh (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 03:48:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 08:48:21 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: xuwei5@hisilicon.com, Arnd Bergmann , Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." , open list , "moderated list:ARM/HISILICON SOC..." Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] ARM64: dts: hi6220-hikey: Add clock binding for the pmic mfd Message-ID: <20170505074821.fgnkq6lggde6gdv2@dell> References: <1493066439-6889-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <20170504220721.GB5252@mai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170504220721.GB5252@mai> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 05 May 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:40:22PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > The hi655x PMIC provides the regulators but also a clock. The latter is missing > > in the definition and in the DT, thus it is no possible to enable the WiFi which > > depends on this clock. > > > > The hi655x's clock has been added and the hi655x multifunction driver has > > updated with a clock-cell. > > > > This patch adds the clock-cells for the PMIC in the DT and updates the > > documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > > Acked-by: Rob Herring > > Acked-by: Lee Jones > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > > Cc: Stephen Boyd > > Cc: Michael Turquette > > --- > > Changelog: > > v4: > > - Added Acked-by's > > - Updated the commit message with a better description > > --- > > Hi Xu Wei, > > a gentle reminder for this patch. Is it ok for you? a) Pings aren't usually received well. If you wish to remind maintainers of a patch's existence a [RESEND] is usually the most accepted method. b) There is usually little point (at least it's significantly reduced) in sending pings/resends whilst the merge-window is open. Maintainers usually take this time to take a little breather (rest) from their duties. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog