From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755779AbdEHPX6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 11:23:58 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:43872 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755725AbdEHPX5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 11:23:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 16:24:00 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Jens Axboe Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Scott Branden , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Linux Kernel Mailing List , bcm-kernel-feedback-list , Olof Johansson Subject: Re: FIO performance regression in 4.11 kernel vs. 4.10 kernel observed on ARM64 Message-ID: <20170508152400.GB7131@arm.com> References: <50f528e8-8d8d-b168-784d-607a602ba808@broadcom.com> <20170508110754.GI8526@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 08:08:55AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 05/08/2017 05:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > >> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 06:37:55PM -0700, Scott Branden wrote: > >>> I have updated the kernel to 4.11 and see significant performance > >>> drops using fio-2.9. > >>> > >>> Using FIO the performanced drops from 281 KIOPS to 207 KIOPS using > >>> single core and task. > >>> Percent performance drop becomes even worse if multi-cores and multi- > >>> threads are used. > >>> > >>> Platform is ARM64 based A72. Can somebody reproduce the results or > >>> know what may have changed to make such a dramatic change? > >>> > >>> FIO command and resulting log output below using null_blk to remove > >>> as many hardware specific driver dependencies as possible. > >>> > >>> modprobe null_blk queue_mode=2 irqmode=0 completion_nsec=0 > >>> submit_queues=1 bs=4096 > >>> > >>> taskset 0x1 fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --numjobs=1 > >>> --gtod_reduce=1 --name=readtest --filename=/dev/nullb0 --bs=4k > >>> --iodepth=128 --time_based --runtime=15 --readwrite=read > >> > >> I can confirm that I also see a ~20% drop in results from 4.10 to 4.11 on > >> my AMD Seattle board w/ defconfig, but I can't see anything obvious in the > >> log. > >> > >> Things you could try: > >> > >> 1. Try disabling CONFIG_NUMA in the 4.11 kernel (this was enabled in > >> defconfig between the releases). > >> > >> 2. Try to reproduce on an x86 box > >> > >> 3. Have a go at bisecting the issue, so we can revert the offender if > >> necessary. > > > > One more thing to try early: As 4.11 gained support for blk-mq I/O > > schedulers compared to 4.10, null_blk will now also need some extra > > cycles for each I/O request. Try loading the driver with "queue_mode=0" > > or "queue_mode=1" instead of "queue_mode=2". > > Since you have 1 submit queues set, you are being loaded with deadline > attached. To compare 4.10 and 4.11, with queue_mode=2 and submit_queues=1, > after loading null_blk in 4.11, do: > > # echo none > /sys/block/nullb0/queue/scheduler > > and re-test. On my setup, doing this restored a bunch of the performance, but the numbers are still ~5% worse than 4.10 (as opposed to ~20% worse with mq-deadline). Disabling NUMA as well cuts this down to ~2%. Scott -- do you see the same sort of thing? Will