mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 for-4.12-fixes 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 12:17:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170509161740.GD8609@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)

Currently, rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list is a traversal ordered list of all
live cfs_rqs which have ever been active on the CPU; unfortunately,
this makes update_blocked_averages() O(total number of CPU cgroups)
which isn't scalable at all.

The next patch will make rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list only contain the cfs_rqs
which are currently active.  In preparation, this patch converts users
which need to traverse all cfs_rqs to use task_groups list instead.

task_groups list is protected by its own lock and allows RCU protected
traversal and the order of operations guarantees that all online
cfs_rqs will be visited, but holding rq->lock won't protect against
iterating an already unregistered cfs_rq.  However, the operations of
the two users that get converted - update_runtime_enabled() and
unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() - should be safe to perform on already
dead cfs_rqs, so adding rcu read protection around them should be
enough.

Note that print_cfs_stats() is not converted.  The next patch will
change its behavior to print out only active cfs_rqs, which is
intended as there's not much point in printing out idle cfs_rqs.

v2: Dropped strong synchronization around removal and left
    print_cfs_stats() unchanged as suggested by Peterz.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
Peter,

Updated the patch - pasted in your version and updated the description
accordingly.  Please feel free to use this one or whichever you like.

Based on mainline and stable is cc'd.

Thanks.

 kernel/sched/fair.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4644,22 +4644,32 @@ static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct
 
 static void __maybe_unused update_runtime_enabled(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+	struct task_group *tg;
 
-	for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
-		struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = &cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth;
+	lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tg, &task_groups, list) {
+		struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = &tg->cfs_bandwidth;
+		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[cpu_of(rq)];
 
 		raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
 		cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF;
 		raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+	struct task_group *tg;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tg, &task_groups, list) {
+		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[cpu_of(rq)];
 
-	for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
 		if (!cfs_rq->runtime_enabled)
 			continue;
 
@@ -4677,6 +4687,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_of
 		if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
 			unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 #else /* CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH */

             reply	other threads:[~2017-05-09 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-09 16:17 Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-05-09 16:18 ` [PATCH v2 for-4.12-fixes 2/2] sched/fair: Fix O(# total cgroups) in load balance path Tejun Heo
2017-05-10  6:50   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-10 14:44     ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-10 15:55       ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-11  7:02       ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-12 13:16         ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-12 14:36           ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-10 17:36   ` [PATCH v3 " Tejun Heo
2017-05-24 23:40 ` [PATCH v2 for-4.12-fixes 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs Tim Chen
2017-05-25 14:39   ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-26 23:04     ` Tim Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170509161740.GD8609@htj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome