mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched/deadline: Remove if statement before clearing throttle and yielded
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 15:01:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170511140116.4ojn67utqjp5x2j5@e106622-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170510095044.6a04b2dc@gandalf.local.home>

Hi,

On 10/05/17 09:50, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [
>   This is an RFC as I didn't run any benchmarks. It just seemed a bit 
>   weird to me that we would add such a check instead of just clearing
>   these variables out regardless.
> ]
> 
> The function replenish_dl_entity() clears dl_throttled and dl_yielded,
> but checks first if they are set before doing so. As these variables
> are in the same cache locale of other variables being modified, there's
> no advantage in checking if they are set before clearing them. But
> having the compare takes slots away from the branch prediction.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index a2ce590..9748d33 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -423,10 +423,8 @@ static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
>  		dl_se->runtime = pi_se->dl_runtime;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (dl_se->dl_yielded)
> -		dl_se->dl_yielded = 0;
> -	if (dl_se->dl_throttled)
> -		dl_se->dl_throttled = 0;
> +	dl_se->dl_yielded = 0;
> +	dl_se->dl_throttled = 0;
>  }

Looks good to me.

Peter, any particular reason why you wanted to first check the values?

Best,

- Juri

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-11 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-10 13:50 Steven Rostedt
2017-05-11 14:01 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-05-11 17:29   ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2017-05-11 19:50   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170511140116.4ojn67utqjp5x2j5@e106622-lin \
    --to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®