From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757199AbdELIMN (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 04:12:13 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:52575 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755606AbdELIMI (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 04:12:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 01:11:26 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Al Viro , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Christoph Hellwig , Greg KH , Thomas Garnier , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , David Howells , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Nyffenegger , Andrew Morton , "Paul E . McKenney" , "Eric W . Biederman" , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Tikhomirov , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Rik van Riel , Kees Cook , Josh Poimboeuf , Borislav Petkov , Brian Gerst , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Christian Borntraeger , Russell King , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , James Morse , linux-s390 , LKML , Linux API , the arch/x86 maintainers , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Kernel Hardening , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] syscalls: Verify address limit before returning to user-mode Message-ID: <20170512081126.GA7188@infradead.org> References: <20170428153213.137279-1-thgarnie@google.com> <20170508073352.caqe3fqf7nuxypgi@gmail.com> <20170508124621.GA20705@kroah.com> <20170509064522.anusoikaalvlux3w@gmail.com> <20170509085659.GA32555@infradead.org> <20170512070012.7dysuhbkcas7ibaj@gmail.com> <20170512071549.GP390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > How realistic and how useful would it be to first completely eliminate > the ones that are in loadable modules and then wrapping the definition > in #ifndef MODULE (or even make it an extern function)? Should be fairly doable and might be a nice step towards cleaning the mess up. In fact with my seres a large part of those are gone, and most of the remaining handler are ioctl handlers or what seems like opencoded versions of probe_kernel_read. But it won't help against exploits modifying addr_limit manually.