From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: x86/aes - Don't use %rbp as temporary register
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 15:44:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170517204427.lwvzonoa26paoitk@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517040308.406-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com>
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:03:08PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>
> When using the "aes-asm" implementation of AES (*not* the AES-NI
> implementation) on an x86_64, v4.12-rc1 kernel with lockdep enabled, the
> following warning was reported, along with a long unwinder dump:
>
> WARNING: kernel stack regs at ffffc90000643558 in kworker/u4:2:155 has bad 'bp' value 000000000000001c
>
> The problem is that aes_enc_block() and aes_dec_block() use %rbp as a
> temporary register, which breaks stack traces if an interrupt occurs.
>
> Fix this by replacing %rbp with %r9, which was being used to hold the
> saved value of %rbp. This required rearranging the AES round macro
> slightly since %r9d cannot be used as the target of a move from %ah-%dh.
>
> Performance is essentially unchanged --- actually about 0.2% faster than
> before. Interestingly, I also measured aes-generic as being nearly 7%
> faster than aes-asm, so perhaps aes-asm has outlived its usefulness...
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-17 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-17 4:03 Eric Biggers
2017-05-17 20:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-05-17 22:21 ` Eric Biggers
2017-05-19 1:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-19 2:50 ` Eric Biggers
2017-05-23 5:01 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170517204427.lwvzonoa26paoitk@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®