mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] HID: intel_ish-hid: clarify locking in client code
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 22:21:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170518202144.3482304-3-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170518202144.3482304-1-arnd@arndb.de>

I was trying to understand this code while working on a warning
fix and the locking made no sense: spin_lock_irqsave() is pointless
when run inside of an interrupt handler or nested inside of another
spin_lock_irq() or spin_lock_irqsave().

Here it turned out that the comment above the function is wrong,
as both recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma() and recv_ishtp_cl_msg() can in fact
be called from a work queue rather than an ISR, so we do have to
use the irqsave() version once.

This fixes the comments accordingly, removes the misleading 'dev_flags'
variable and modifies the inner spinlock to not use 'irqsave'.

No functional change is intended, this is just for readability and
it slightly simplifies the object code.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c | 43 +++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c
index 78d393e616a4..f54689ee67e1 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ void ishtp_cl_send_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev, struct ishtp_cl *cl)
  * @ishtp_hdr: Pointer to message header
  *
  * Receive and dispatch ISHTP client messages. This function executes in ISR
- * context
+ * or work queue context
  */
 void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
 		       struct ishtp_msg_hdr *ishtp_hdr)
@@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
 	struct ishtp_cl_rb *new_rb;
 	unsigned char *buffer = NULL;
 	struct ishtp_cl_rb *complete_rb = NULL;
-	unsigned long	dev_flags;
 	unsigned long	flags;
 	int	rb_count;
 
@@ -828,7 +827,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
 		goto	eoi;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
 	rb_count = -1;
 	list_for_each_entry(rb, &dev->read_list.list, list) {
 		++rb_count;
@@ -840,8 +839,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
 
 		 /* If no Rx buffer is allocated, disband the rb */
 		if (rb->buffer.size == 0 || rb->buffer.data == NULL) {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock,
-				dev_flags);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
 			dev_err(&cl->device->dev,
 				"Rx buffer is not allocated.\n");
 			list_del(&rb->list);
@@ -857,8 +855,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
 		 * back FC, so communication will be stuck anyway)
 		 */
 		if (rb->buffer.size < ishtp_hdr->length + rb->buf_idx) {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock,
-				dev_flags);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
 			dev_err(&cl->device->dev,
 				"message overflow. size %d len %d idx %ld\n",
 				rb->buffer.size, ishtp_hdr->length,
@@ -884,14 +881,13 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
 			 * the whole msg arrived, send a new FC, and add a new
 			 * rb buffer for the next coming msg
 			 */
-			spin_lock_irqsave(&cl->free_list_spinlock, flags);
+			spin_lock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
 
 			if (!list_empty(&cl->free_rb_list.list)) {
 				new_rb = list_entry(cl->free_rb_list.list.next,
 					struct ishtp_cl_rb, list);
 				list_del_init(&new_rb->list);
-				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cl->free_list_spinlock,
-					flags);
+				spin_unlock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
 				new_rb->cl = cl;
 				new_rb->buf_idx = 0;
 				INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_rb->list);
@@ -900,8 +896,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
 
 				ishtp_hbm_cl_flow_control_req(dev, cl);
 			} else {
-				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cl->free_list_spinlock,
-					flags);
+				spin_unlock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
 			}
 		}
 		/* One more fragment in message (even if this was last) */
@@ -914,7 +909,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
 	/* If it's nobody's message, just read and discard it */
 	if (!buffer) {
 		uint8_t	rd_msg_buf[ISHTP_RD_MSG_BUF_SIZE];
@@ -941,7 +936,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
  * @hbm: hbm buffer
  *
  * Receive and dispatch ISHTP client messages using DMA. This function executes
- * in ISR context
+ * in ISR or work queue context
  */
 void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
 			   struct dma_xfer_hbm *hbm)
@@ -951,10 +946,10 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
 	struct ishtp_cl_rb *new_rb;
 	unsigned char *buffer = NULL;
 	struct ishtp_cl_rb *complete_rb = NULL;
-	unsigned long	dev_flags;
 	unsigned long	flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
+
 	list_for_each_entry(rb, &dev->read_list.list, list) {
 		cl = rb->cl;
 		if (!cl || !(cl->host_client_id == hbm->host_client_id &&
@@ -966,8 +961,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
 		 * If no Rx buffer is allocated, disband the rb
 		 */
 		if (rb->buffer.size == 0 || rb->buffer.data == NULL) {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock,
-				dev_flags);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
 			dev_err(&cl->device->dev,
 				"response buffer is not allocated.\n");
 			list_del(&rb->list);
@@ -983,8 +977,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
 		 * back FC, so communication will be stuck anyway)
 		 */
 		if (rb->buffer.size < hbm->msg_length) {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock,
-				dev_flags);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
 			dev_err(&cl->device->dev,
 				"message overflow. size %d len %d idx %ld\n",
 				rb->buffer.size, hbm->msg_length, rb->buf_idx);
@@ -1008,14 +1001,13 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
 		 * the whole msg arrived, send a new FC, and add a new
 		 * rb buffer for the next coming msg
 		 */
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&cl->free_list_spinlock, flags);
+		spin_lock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
 
 		if (!list_empty(&cl->free_rb_list.list)) {
 			new_rb = list_entry(cl->free_rb_list.list.next,
 				struct ishtp_cl_rb, list);
 			list_del_init(&new_rb->list);
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cl->free_list_spinlock,
-				flags);
+			spin_unlock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
 			new_rb->cl = cl;
 			new_rb->buf_idx = 0;
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_rb->list);
@@ -1024,8 +1016,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
 
 			ishtp_hbm_cl_flow_control_req(dev, cl);
 		} else {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cl->free_list_spinlock,
-				flags);
+			spin_unlock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
 		}
 
 		/* One more fragment in message (this is always last) */
@@ -1038,7 +1029,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
 	/* If it's nobody's message, just read and discard it */
 	if (!buffer) {
 		dev_err(dev->devc, "Dropped Rx (DMA) msg - no request\n");
-- 
2.9.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-18 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-18 20:21 HID: intel_ish-hid: various cleanups Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-18 20:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] HID: intel_ish-hid: fix potential uninitialized data usage Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-22 19:17   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-05-22 21:33     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-23 22:24   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-05-24  8:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-26 20:58   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-05-18 20:21 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2017-05-26 20:58   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] HID: intel_ish-hid: clarify locking in client code Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-05-18 20:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] HID: intel_ish-hid: convert timespec to ktime_t Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-26 20:58   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-05-18 20:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] HID: intel_ish-hid: fix format string for size_t Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-22 23:46   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-05-23  8:35     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-26 20:58   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-05-18 20:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] HID: intel_ish-hid: enable compile testing Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-26 20:59   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-05-26 20:57 ` HID: intel_ish-hid: various cleanups Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-05-30 12:13 ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170518202144.3482304-3-arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome