From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754806AbdESNC3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2017 09:02:29 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43741 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751598AbdESNC0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2017 09:02:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:02:23 +0200 From: Petr Mladek To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Russell King , Daniel Thompson , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Chris Metcalf , x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: Use the main logbuf in NMI when logbuf_lock is available Message-ID: <20170519130223.GB12489@pathway.suse.cz> References: <1493912763-24873-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <20170519025803.GA593@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170519043815.GB593@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170519043815.GB593@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2017-05-19 13:38:15, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (05/19/17 11:58), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > void printk_nmi_exit(void) > > > { > > > - this_cpu_and(printk_context, ~PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK); > > > + this_cpu_and(printk_context, > > > + ~(PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK || > > > + PRINTK_NMI_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_MASK)); > > > } > > [..] > > > the problem is that > > > > `PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK || PRINTK_NMI_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_MASK' is 0x01 > > d'oh... forgot to copy-paste this... Grrr, thanks a lot for chasing this down and I am sorry for the troubles. > --- > > diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c > index 6fec9cfb9a69..b6ff3fe4370a 100644 > --- a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c > @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ void printk_nmi_enter(void) > void printk_nmi_exit(void) > { > this_cpu_and(printk_context, > - ~(PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK || > + ~(PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK | > PRINTK_NMI_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_MASK)); > } I have rebased both for-4.13 and for-next branches in printk.git with this fix. I wanted to get rid of this bug in linux-next ASAP. Please, let me know if you would prefer to handle this another way in the future. Best Regards, Petr