From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932402AbdESU61 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2017 16:58:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com ([209.85.220.180]:34845 "EHLO mail-qk0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752608AbdESU6X (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2017 16:58:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:58:20 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Waiman Long Cc: Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, luto@amacapital.net, efault@gmx.de Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/17] cgroup: Implement new thread mode semantics Message-ID: <20170519205820.GE15279@wtj.duckdns.org> References: <1494855256-12558-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <1494855256-12558-12-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <20170519202624.GA15279@wtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170519202624.GA15279@wtj.duckdns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:26:24PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > (exactly in the way necessary), I wonder whether it'd be better to > simply allow root to be both domain and thread root. I'll give this approach a shot early next week. Thanks. -- tejun