mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] watchdog: core: add option to avoid early handling of watchdog
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 18:31:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170520163100.b36l56k45jlylufu@earth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878tlxpycf.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1689 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:08:32AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Sun, May 14 2017, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> > On 05/12/2017 05:05 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> >> On some systems its desirable to have watchdog reboot the system
> >> when it does not come up fast enough. This adds a kernel parameter
> >> to disable the auto-update of watchdog before userspace takes over
> >> and a kernel option to set the default. The info messages were
> >> added to shorten error searching on misconfigured systems.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> >
> > Minor nitpicks below (which I fixed up in my watchdog-next branch).
> > Otherwise
> 
> Guenter, Sebastian, can I pursuade you to take a (second) look at the
> patches [1] I sent 4 months ago that implement the same thing, except
> that they also give a .config and a boot-cmdline way to define what
> "fast enough" means - which is necessary in many cases where it's simply
> not realistic to have userspace up-and-running before the dog is hungry.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/9/408
> 
> I'm of course happy to rebase and retest those on top of current master,
> but the implementation and semantics should be reviewable as-is.

I wasn't aware of your work. For the hardware I work with at
Collabora my patch is enough, since "fast enough" is defined by
correct watchdog configuration (done by the bootloader).

I guess something like your patch is required for systems, which do
not reach userspace in < 60 seconds (minus some safety margin). This
is not needed by us. OTOH your patches should also work for our use case. 

-- Sebastian

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2017-05-20 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-11 12:52 [PATCH] " Sebastian Reichel
2017-05-11 13:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-12 12:05   ` [PATCHv2] " Sebastian Reichel
2017-05-14 14:47     ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-15 22:08       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2017-05-20 16:31         ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170520163100.b36l56k45jlylufu@earth \
    --to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®