From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934751AbdEVOaW (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 10:30:22 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:52422 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933917AbdEVOaT (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 10:30:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:30:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20170522.103010.1779800840743690143.davem@davemloft.net> To: kvalo@codeaurora.org Cc: sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk, sre@kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, marcel@holtmann.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] wlcore: add wl1285 compatible From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <8737bx5jgr.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <20170505141553.2605-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> <8737bx5jgr.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Mon, 22 May 2017 06:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kalle Valo Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:28:20 +0300 > Sebastian Reichel writes: > >> Motorola Droid 4 uses a WL1285C. With differences between the >> chips not being public let's add explicit binding for wl1285 >> instead of relying on wl1283 being very similar. >> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring >> Acked-by: Kalle Valo >> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel >> --- >> Hi Dave, >> >> I previously send this in two patches, but its hard to apply without >> requiring multiple kernel releases (the driver must be updated before >> the DTS change). Since the actual change is not very complex Marcel >> Holtmann & Tony Lindgren suggested, that I send this directly to you >> in a single patch for inclusion into 4.12. This also means, that the >> remaining series can be queued normally for 4.13. > > I noticed that Dave set this patch to Awaiting Upstream state on his > patchwork: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/759042/ > > Which makes me suspect that he is waiting me to apply this (as I > normally apply wlcore patches). Dave, should I actually take this patch? > What do you prefer? Anything that touches wireless drivers I defer to you, yes.