From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1764968AbdEWUKd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 23 May 2017 16:10:33 -0400
Received: from mail-yb0-f196.google.com ([209.85.213.196]:33351 "EHLO
        mail-yb0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752808AbdEWUKc (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 23 May 2017 16:10:32 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 16:10:29 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Ensure that cpumask set for pools created
 after boot
Message-ID: <20170523201029.GH13222@htj.duckdns.org>
References: <a776cff1-1d56-a59a-8336-589a9a2b9fb4@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20170510173340.GF32165@htj.duckdns.org>
 <ed3fc72a-b5b7-659c-f44a-9bd7061fa196@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20170516155527.GB6389@htj.duckdns.org>
 <b981e817-8f96-31cf-421b-5f38b8f23628@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20170523194952.GF13222@htj.duckdns.org>
 <d757731e-8770-05a0-9d39-9b296bdccd52@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d757731e-8770-05a0-9d39-9b296bdccd52@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello,

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 03:09:07PM -0500, Michael Bringmann wrote:
> To confirm, you want the WARN_ON(cpumask_any(pool->attrs->cpumask) >= NR_CPUS)
> at the point where I place my current patch?

Yeah, cpumask_weight() probably is a bit more intuitive but I'm
curious why we're creating workqueues for a node before cpus come
online.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun