From: Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@google.com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] nfc: Fix the sockaddr length sanitization in llcp_sock_connect
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 12:26:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170524102620.13806-1-mjurczyk@google.com> (raw)
Fix the sockaddr length verification in the connect() handler of NFC/LLCP
sockets, to compare against the size of the actual structure expected on
input (sockaddr_nfc_llcp) instead of its shorter version (sockaddr_nfc).
Both structures are defined in include/uapi/linux/nfc.h. The fields
specific to the _llcp extended struct are as follows:
276 __u8 dsap; /* Destination SAP, if known */
277 __u8 ssap; /* Source SAP to be bound to */
278 char service_name[NFC_LLCP_MAX_SERVICE_NAME]; /* Service name URI */;
279 size_t service_name_len;
If the caller doesn't provide a sufficiently long sockaddr buffer, these
fields remain uninitialized (and they currently originate from the stack
frame of the top-level sys_connect handler). They are then copied by
llcp_sock_connect() into internal storage (nfc_llcp_sock structure), and
could be subsequently read back through the user-mode getsockname()
function (handled by llcp_sock_getname()). This would result in the
disclosure of up to ~70 uninitialized bytes from the kernel stack to
user-mode clients capable of creating AFC_NFC sockets.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@google.com>
---
net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
index 2ffb18e73df6..d0d12bea65cb 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
@@ -662,8 +662,7 @@ static int llcp_sock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *_addr,
pr_debug("sock %p sk %p flags 0x%x\n", sock, sk, flags);
- if (!addr || len < sizeof(struct sockaddr_nfc) ||
- addr->sa_family != AF_NFC)
+ if (!addr || len < sizeof(*addr) || addr->sa_family != AF_NFC)
return -EINVAL;
if (addr->service_name_len == 0 && addr->dsap == 0)
--
2.13.0.219.gdb65acc882-goog
next reply other threads:[~2017-05-24 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 10:26 Mateusz Jurczyk [this message]
2017-05-24 16:58 ` Kees Cook
2017-06-22 22:27 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170524102620.13806-1-mjurczyk@google.com \
--to=mjurczyk@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®