From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1947020AbdEZGyt (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2017 02:54:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:33373 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1163749AbdEZGys (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2017 02:54:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 08:54:44 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" Cc: "ben@decadent.org.uk" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] liblockdep: Fix undefined symbol prandom_u32 Message-ID: <20170526065444.neuxegeowzvlle5c@gmail.com> References: <20170518000231.16163-1-alexander.levin@verizon.com> <20170524075336.k43eenslxqcc7piw@gmail.com> <20170525123601.yhgnlujb4c4mvcfw@sasha-lappy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170525123601.yhgnlujb4c4mvcfw@sasha-lappy> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:53:37AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > So I'm not sure how you sent these patches, but probably due to the lack of a > > boilerplate message, the order was all mixed up. I got the patch order right on > > the third attempt. > > > > But then I encountered this build failure (when applied to Linus's latest tree): > > > > triton:~/tip/tools/lib/lockdep> make > > CC common.o > > CC lockdep.o > > In file included from lockdep.c:25:0: > > ../../../kernel/locking/lockdep.c:33:28: fatal error: linux/sched/mm.h: No such > > file or directory > > #include > > ^ > > Heh, apparently a bunch of stuff changed between the point when I sent my > original pull request and now... I'll resend with additional fixes. Yeah, and also note that this is v4.13 material at best - liblockdep broke a long time ago so it falls under 'development', not 'regression fixes'. Thanks, Ingo