From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751187AbdEaTAm (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 May 2017 15:00:42 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48286 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750898AbdEaTAk (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 May 2017 15:00:40 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CE37F23A02 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=helgaas@kernel.org Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:00:37 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Mason Cc: Marc Zyngier , Robin Murphy , Marc Gonzalez , Thomas Gleixner , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Liviu Dudau , David Laight , linux-pci , Linux ARM , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: Add tango MSI controller support Message-ID: <20170531190037.GA18084@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> References: <8e56647d-3b2d-9bfc-b59e-79a2efaa7826@sigmadesigns.com> <20170523170319.GB24431@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20170531173414.GB4496@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <4885137f-7c1c-5742-4f66-f48c32ce7abb@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4885137f-7c1c-5742-4f66-f48c32ce7abb@free.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:49:04PM +0200, Mason wrote: > On 31/05/2017 19:34, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > ... > > This would be more an IRQ patch than a PCI patch, but if I were > > reviewing it, I would look for assurance that *all* the no-op > > .irq_set_affinity callbacks were cleaned up, not just those in > > drivers/pci/host. > > Are you saying the patch is *wrong* if not all "do-nothing" > callbacks are cleaned up? I'm saying that (1) this probably wouldn't be applied via the PCI tree, and (2) if it *were* applied via PCI, I would ask that all the no-op callbacks were cleaned up at the same time. Huh, that sounds a lot like what I wrote above. Was I unclear? Bjorn