From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: warn in case userspace lied about modprobe return
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 20:03:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170601180347.GL8951@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170528020144.3dgchl3wegukth2i@jeyu>
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 07:01:45PM -0700, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Luis R. Rodriguez [25/05/17 17:44 -0700]:
> > kmod <= v19 was broken -- it could return 0 to modprobe calls,
> > incorrectly assuming that a kernel module was built-in, whereas in
> > reality the module was just forming in the kernel. The reason for this
> > is an incorrect userspace heuristics. A userspace kmod fix is available
> > for it [0], however should userspace break again we could go on with
> > an failed get_fs_type() which is hard to debug as the request_module()
> > is detected as returning 0. The first suspect would be that there is
> > something worth with the kernel's module loader and obviously in this
> > case that is not the issue.
> >
> > Since these issues are painful to debug complain when we know userspace
> > has outright lied to us.
> >
> > [0] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod.git/commit/libkmod/libkmod-module.c?id=fd44a98ae2eb5eb32161088954ab21e58e19dfc4
> >
> > Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> > Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/filesystems.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/filesystems.c b/fs/filesystems.c
> > index cac75547d35c..0f477a5de6ea 100644
> > --- a/fs/filesystems.c
> > +++ b/fs/filesystems.c
> > @@ -275,8 +275,10 @@ struct file_system_type *get_fs_type(const char *name)
> > int len = dot ? dot - name : strlen(name);
> >
> > fs = __get_fs_type(name, len);
> > - if (!fs && (request_module("fs-%.*s", len, name) == 0))
> > + if (!fs && (request_module("fs-%.*s", len, name) == 0)) {
> > + WARN_ONCE(!fs, "request_module fs-%.*s succeeded, but still no fs?\n", len, name);
>
> The WARN needs to go below the second __get_fs_type() attempt, no?
> Because we want to try __get_fs_type() again right after
> request_module(), to see if the fs loaded, and _then_ WARN if it
> doesn't appear to be loaded.
Doh, yes, sorry will send v2.
Luis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-26 0:44 Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-28 2:01 ` Jessica Yu
2017-06-01 18:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170601180347.GL8951@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome