mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: warn in case userspace lied about modprobe return
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 20:03:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170601180347.GL8951@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170528020144.3dgchl3wegukth2i@jeyu>

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 07:01:45PM -0700, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Luis R. Rodriguez [25/05/17 17:44 -0700]:
> > kmod <= v19 was broken -- it could return 0 to modprobe calls,
> > incorrectly assuming that a kernel module was built-in, whereas in
> > reality the module was just forming in the kernel. The reason for this
> > is an incorrect userspace heuristics. A userspace kmod fix is available
> > for it [0], however should userspace break again we could go on with
> > an failed get_fs_type() which is hard to debug as the request_module()
> > is detected as returning 0. The first suspect would be that there is
> > something worth with the kernel's module loader and obviously in this
> > case that is not the issue.
> > 
> > Since these issues are painful to debug complain when we know userspace
> > has  outright lied to us.
> > 
> > [0] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod.git/commit/libkmod/libkmod-module.c?id=fd44a98ae2eb5eb32161088954ab21e58e19dfc4
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> > Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/filesystems.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/filesystems.c b/fs/filesystems.c
> > index cac75547d35c..0f477a5de6ea 100644
> > --- a/fs/filesystems.c
> > +++ b/fs/filesystems.c
> > @@ -275,8 +275,10 @@ struct file_system_type *get_fs_type(const char *name)
> > 	int len = dot ? dot - name : strlen(name);
> > 
> > 	fs = __get_fs_type(name, len);
> > -	if (!fs && (request_module("fs-%.*s", len, name) == 0))
> > +	if (!fs && (request_module("fs-%.*s", len, name) == 0)) {
> > +		WARN_ONCE(!fs, "request_module fs-%.*s succeeded, but still no fs?\n", len, name);
> 
> The WARN needs to go below the second __get_fs_type() attempt, no?
> Because we want to try __get_fs_type() again right after
> request_module(), to see if the fs loaded, and _then_ WARN if it
> doesn't appear to be loaded.

Doh, yes, sorry will send v2.

  Luis

      reply	other threads:[~2017-06-01 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-26  0:44 Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-28  2:01 ` Jessica Yu
2017-06-01 18:03   ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170601180347.GL8951@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome