From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751491AbdFBOII (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:08:08 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:42946 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750955AbdFBOIG (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:08:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 10:08:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20170602.100801.2029534530888525251.davem@davemloft.net> To: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com Cc: clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, wens@csie.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/21] net-next: stmmac: add dwmac-sun8i ethernet driver From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20170602063752.aqyvwcykvepiyt4y@flea.lan> References: <20170531071852.12422-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20170601.145819.789604139072328057.davem@davemloft.net> <20170602063752.aqyvwcykvepiyt4y@flea.lan> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Maxime Ripard Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 08:37:52 +0200 > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:58:19PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> From: Corentin Labbe >> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:18:31 +0200 >> >> > This patch series add the driver for dwmac-sun8i which handle the Ethernet MAC >> > present on Allwinner H3/H5/A83T/A64 SoCs. >> >> Series applied, but wow that's a lot of DT file changes :-( > > The DT patches should not go through your tree, but arm-soc, so I > guess this is not an issue for you? I already applied them, so if that is the intention, too late. This needs to be explicitly stated in the header posting. Otherwise I assume the entire series is meant to go into my tree. Also, saying "net-next" in the patch subjects means it's targetting my tree.