From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751258AbdFCWBO (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:01:14 -0400 Received: from www.llwyncelyn.cymru ([82.70.14.225]:45402 "EHLO fuzix.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751162AbdFCWBL (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:01:11 -0400 Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:00:48 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Matt Brown Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Kees Cook , Casey Schaufler , Boris Lukashev , Greg KH , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , linux-security-module , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] security: tty: make TIOCSTI ioctl require CAP_SYS_ADMIN Message-ID: <20170603230048.52b7f111@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <48a28010-9f35-63e4-b815-71bb6139d50b@nmatt.com> References: <20170530132427.016053da@alans-desktop> <2ab8580e-bf8e-21bd-6bfa-33e5fa82400b@nmatt.com> <20170530235106.11aab25c@alans-desktop> <3bd4ff7b-6f7d-52b0-03f6-026bac79f11f@nmatt.com> <20170531005633.484a2e14@alans-desktop> <20170601140812.583cf0a5@alans-desktop> <20170601222432.6f593538@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <2d0ad49c-886e-1caf-771a-d251957f614c@nmatt.com> <20170602153647.GA2688@mail.hallyn.com> <20170602210544.73680be8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <48a28010-9f35-63e4-b815-71bb6139d50b@nmatt.com> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > TIOCSLCKTRMIOS That one I'm more dubious about > TIOCSLTC > TIOCSSOFTCAR tty_io.c also has a few and n_tty has a couple we'd want. > > would it be overkill to have a sysctl kernel.ttyioctlwhitelist.X where X > is one of the ioctls above? Why would anyone want to change the entries on that list Alan