From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
Vinnie Magro <vmagro@fb.com>,
kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [btrfs] beeeccca9b: WARNING:at_mm/util.c:#kvmalloc_node
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:30:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170605133023.57a82e4d@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170531145848.GB12135@suse.cz>
Hi David,
On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:58:48 +0200 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:29:20AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c
> > index fc0bd8406758..5abd3cd71144 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c
> > @@ -153,21 +153,18 @@ static inline u32 free_space_bitmap_size(u64 size, u32 sectorsize)
> >
> > static u8 *alloc_bitmap(u32 bitmap_size)
> > {
> > - void *mem;
> > + u8 *ret;
> > + unsigned int nofs_flag;
> >
> > /*
> > - * The allocation size varies, observed numbers were < 4K up to 16K.
> > - * Using vmalloc unconditionally would be too heavy, we'll try
> > - * contiguous allocations first.
> > + * GFP_NOFS doesn't work with kvmalloc(), but we really can't recurse
> > + * into the filesystem as the free space bitmap can be modified in the
> > + * critical section of a transaction commit.
> > */
> > - if (bitmap_size <= PAGE_SIZE)
> > - return kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_NOFS);
> > -
> > - mem = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > - if (mem)
> > - return mem;
> > -
> > - return __vmalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO, PAGE_KERNEL);
> > + nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
> > + ret = kvmalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > int convert_free_space_to_bitmaps(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >
> > Dave, would you prefer to replace the patch we have now or do an
> > incremental patch on top of it?
>
> I'll drop the patch "btrfs: Use kvzalloc instead of kzalloc/vmalloc in
> alloc_bitmap", please send an updated version.
Ping?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-05 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-31 6:30 kernel test robot
2017-05-31 6:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-31 9:12 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-31 9:19 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-31 9:29 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-31 10:30 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-31 14:58 ` David Sterba
2017-06-05 3:30 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2017-06-05 11:43 ` David Sterba
2017-06-05 12:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170605133023.57a82e4d@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=vmagro@fb.com \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®