From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751215AbdFFHRM (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2017 03:17:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:37861 "EHLO mail-wm0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751073AbdFFHRI (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2017 03:17:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 08:17:03 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Keerthy Cc: tony@atomide.com, milo.kim@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] mfd: Remove redundant i2c_device_id Message-ID: <20170606071703.o6dnzu4vjeywpoxn@dell> References: <1496567924-4278-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> <20170605103740.g4t3veigzpdzfkxi@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 05 Jun 2017, Keerthy wrote: > > > On Monday 05 June 2017 04:07 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Sun, 04 Jun 2017, Keerthy wrote: > > > >> With the introduction of probe_new function the i2c_device_id > >> is no longer needed. Hence the remove the same and use probe_new > >> instead of probe. > >> > >> Keerthy (9): > >> mfd: tps65217: Remove redundant i2c_device_id > >> mfd: tps65218: Remove redundant i2c_device_id > >> mfd: palmas: Remove redundant i2c_device_id > >> mfd: lp873x: Remove redundant i2c_device_id > >> mfd: lp8788: Remove redundant i2c_device_id > >> mfd: lp3943: Remove redundant i2c_device_id > >> mfd: tps65086: Remove redundant i2c_device_id > >> mfd: tps65090: Remove redundant i2c_device_id > >> mfd: tps6586x: Remove redundant i2c_device_id > >> > >> drivers/mfd/lp3943.c | 11 ++--------- > >> drivers/mfd/lp873x.c | 12 ++---------- > >> drivers/mfd/lp8788.c | 11 ++--------- > >> drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 15 ++------------- > >> drivers/mfd/tps65086.c | 12 ++---------- > >> drivers/mfd/tps65090.c | 12 ++---------- > >> drivers/mfd/tps65217.c | 14 +++----------- > >> drivers/mfd/tps65218.c | 9 +++++---- > >> drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 12 ++---------- > > > > Are all of these drivers DT only? > > At least i did not find any platform code calling on to these drivers. > No dependency on OF as such. Hence sent these 9. I can't accept these changes on any drivers which does not depend on OF as a hard requirement. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog