From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: jack@suse.cz, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mhocko@suse.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, dave@stgolabs.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] fs/epoll: Use faster rb_first_cached()
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:03:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170608180329.11457-9-dave@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170608180329.11457-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
... such that we can avoid the tree walks to get the
node with the smallest key. Semantically the same,
as the previously used rb_first(), but O(1). The
main overhead is the extra footprint for the cached
rb_node pointer, which should not matter for epoll.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 1e2cc37cef40..cfc34438d21b 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ struct eventpoll {
struct list_head rdllist;
/* RB tree root used to store monitored fd structs */
- struct rb_root rbr;
+ struct rb_root_cached rbr;
/*
* This is a single linked list that chains all the "struct epitem" that
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ static int ep_remove(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
list_del_rcu(&epi->fllink);
spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
- rb_erase(&epi->rbn, &ep->rbr);
+ rb_erase_cached(&epi->rbn, &ep->rbr);
spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
if (ep_is_linked(&epi->rdllink))
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
/*
* Walks through the whole tree by unregistering poll callbacks.
*/
- for (rbp = rb_first(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
+ for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
ep_unregister_pollwait(ep, epi);
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
* a lockdep warning.
*/
mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
- while ((rbp = rb_first(&ep->rbr)) != NULL) {
+ while ((rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr)) != NULL) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
ep_remove(ep, epi);
cond_resched();
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ static void ep_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
struct rb_node *rbp;
mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
- for (rbp = rb_first(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
+ for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
struct epitem *epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
struct inode *inode = file_inode(epi->ffd.file);
@@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ static int ep_alloc(struct eventpoll **pep)
init_waitqueue_head(&ep->wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&ep->poll_wait);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->rdllist);
- ep->rbr = RB_ROOT;
+ ep->rbr = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
ep->ovflist = EP_UNACTIVE_PTR;
ep->user = user;
@@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ static struct epitem *ep_find(struct eventpoll *ep, struct file *file, int fd)
struct epoll_filefd ffd;
ep_set_ffd(&ffd, file, fd);
- for (rbp = ep->rbr.rb_node; rbp; ) {
+ for (rbp = ep->rbr.rb_root.rb_node; rbp; ) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
kcmp = ep_cmp_ffd(&ffd, &epi->ffd);
if (kcmp > 0)
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static struct epitem *ep_find_tfd(struct eventpoll *ep, int tfd, unsigned long t
struct rb_node *rbp;
struct epitem *epi;
- for (rbp = rb_first(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
+ for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
if (epi->ffd.fd == tfd) {
if (toff == 0)
@@ -1263,20 +1263,22 @@ static void ep_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *whead,
static void ep_rbtree_insert(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
{
int kcmp;
- struct rb_node **p = &ep->rbr.rb_node, *parent = NULL;
+ struct rb_node **p = &ep->rbr.rb_root.rb_node, *parent = NULL;
struct epitem *epic;
+ bool leftmost = true;
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
epic = rb_entry(parent, struct epitem, rbn);
kcmp = ep_cmp_ffd(&epi->ffd, &epic->ffd);
- if (kcmp > 0)
+ if (kcmp > 0) {
p = &parent->rb_right;
- else
+ leftmost = false;
+ } else
p = &parent->rb_left;
}
rb_link_node(&epi->rbn, parent, p);
- rb_insert_color(&epi->rbn, &ep->rbr);
+ rb_insert_color_cached(&epi->rbn, &ep->rbr, leftmost);
}
@@ -1520,7 +1522,7 @@ static int ep_insert(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event *event,
list_del_rcu(&epi->fllink);
spin_unlock(&tfile->f_lock);
- rb_erase(&epi->rbn, &ep->rbr);
+ rb_erase_cached(&epi->rbn, &ep->rbr);
error_unregister:
ep_unregister_pollwait(ep, epi);
@@ -1868,7 +1870,7 @@ static int ep_loop_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, call_nests + 1);
ep->visited = 1;
list_add(&ep->visited_list_link, &visited_list);
- for (rbp = rb_first(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
+ for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
if (unlikely(is_file_epoll(epi->ffd.file))) {
ep_tovisit = epi->ffd.file->private_data;
--
2.12.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-08 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-08 18:03 [PATCH -next v2 0/8] rbtree: Cache leftmost node internally Davidlohr Bueso
2017-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] " Davidlohr Bueso
2017-06-09 7:43 ` Jan Kara
2017-06-09 14:32 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-06-12 9:47 ` Jan Kara
2017-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched/fair: Replace cfs_rq->rb_leftmost Davidlohr Bueso
2017-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched/deadline: Replace earliest dl and rq leftmost caching Davidlohr Bueso
2017-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] locking/rtmutex: Replace top-waiter and pi_waiters " Davidlohr Bueso
2017-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH 5/8] lib/interval_tree: Fast overlap detection Davidlohr Bueso
2017-06-09 8:15 ` Christian König
2017-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] lib/interval-tree: Correct comment wrt generic flavor Davidlohr Bueso
2017-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH 7/8] procfs: Use faster rb_first_cached() Davidlohr Bueso
2017-06-08 18:03 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170608180329.11457-9-dave@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®