From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752059AbdFLBax (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 11 Jun 2017 21:30:53 -0400
Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:43969 "EHLO mga04.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751983AbdFLBav (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 11 Jun 2017 21:30:51 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,331,1493708400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="98239625"
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:30:46 +0800
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "'Borislav Petkov'" <bp@suse.de>,
        "'linux-edac'" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'Stephen Rothwell'" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        "'lkp@01.org'" <lkp@01.org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [EDAC, sb_edac]  e2f747b1f4:
 kmsg.EDAC_sbridge:Failed_to_register_device_with_error
Message-ID: <20170612013046.GG29690@yexl-desktop>
References: <20170605062231.GA2969@yexl-desktop>
 <E6AF1AFDEA62A94A97508F458CBDD47F6F5A2058@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <E6AF1AFDEA62A94A97508F458CBDD47F6F5A321C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <20170609094025.ee33cazzf4qdahle@pd.tnic>
 <E6AF1AFDEA62A94A97508F458CBDD47F6F5A34C4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E6AF1AFDEA62A94A97508F458CBDD47F6F5A34C4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 06/10, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
>> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:bp@alien8.de] 
>>
>> Xiaolong,
>>
>> can you please run Qiuxu's patch to verify it fixes your issue?
>
>
>Hi Boris,
>    I manually verified the fix patch on the Broadwell-DE server on which the bug was found by Xiaolong: 
>    the sb_edac can be loaded successfully, and it identified which size and type of DIMMs were installed
>    in each slot correctly (see attached dmesg.sb_edac.on.Broadwell-DE.log).
>
>Hi Xiaolong,
>   Would you please also test the patch by your LKP method by which the issue was found last time.
>

Got it, I've queued test jobs for your fix patch, will let you know the result
once I get the it.

Thanks,
Xiaolong


>Thanks!
>
>BR
>Qiuxu 
>    
>    
>