From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752504AbdFMG2b (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 02:28:31 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:55191 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752160AbdFMG23 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 02:28:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:28:27 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sebastian Ott , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the s390 tree Message-ID: <20170613162827.3db67f6b@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20170613062055.GA30813@lst.de> References: <20170613130649.6bcede94@canb.auug.org.au> <20170613062055.GA30813@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph, On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 08:20:55 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Btw, scm_blk.c blk-mq conversion seems odd if not broken. It should > always call blk_mq_complete_request from scm_request_finish and > then pass the error to blk_mq_end_request frin > there. > > It would be great if such major block driver changes were Cc'ed to > linux-block. And I missed cc'ing the s390 guys with my report :-( -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell