From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752004AbdFNNz3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:55:29 -0400
Received: from mail-wr0-f172.google.com ([209.85.128.172]:32858 "EHLO
        mail-wr0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750721AbdFNNz1 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:55:27 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:55:22 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise_ip level for
 default cycles event
Message-ID: <20170614135522.onbcuh7aovkto2ld@gmail.com>
References: <20170613232343.4365-1-acme@kernel.org>
 <20170613232343.4365-2-acme@kernel.org>
 <20170614054500.exocsybw2qkug5tn@gmail.com>
 <20170614104426.GA32020@kernel.org>
 <20170614105154.lg5prmc2xfwivjfz@gmail.com>
 <20170614105740.GB32020@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170614105740.GB32020@kernel.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:

> Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:51:55PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > 
> > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Can you try with the patch below, which is hackish but the minimal fix at this
> > > point. Later I'll come up with a way of returning a fully configured cycles
> > > evsel, which will make the tools code simpler, moving more stuff to the
> > > libraries.
> > 
> > Yeah, this patch on top of your tree seems to work better now.
> 
> So how do we proceed, do you want to keep these two as separate or can I
> squash them together, fix that problem with the unwind library and
> provide a new perf/urgent for you to use?
> 
> Off to breakfast now tho :-)

Your call: I had to unpull, so feel free to rebase your urgent branch.

Thanks,

	Ingo