From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752182AbdFNObq (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:31:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37396 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751836AbdFNObp (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:31:45 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 910F4C04B333 Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 910F4C04B333 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:31:41 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Adrian Hunter , Alexander Shishkin , David Ahern , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Wang Nan Subject: Re: perf: unwind: target platform=x86 not supported was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise_ip level for default cycles event Message-ID: <20170614143141.GB14162@krava> References: <20170613232343.4365-1-acme@kernel.org> <20170613232343.4365-2-acme@kernel.org> <20170614054500.exocsybw2qkug5tn@gmail.com> <20170614132947.GC32020@kernel.org> <20170614135242.GD32020@kernel.org> <20170614141951.GA14162@krava> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170614141951.GA14162@krava> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:19:51PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:52:42AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > SNIP > > > > > And what defines it is... > > > > tools/perf/util/libunwind/x86_32.c:#define REMOTE_UNWIND_LIBUNWIND > > > > (and a arm64 file, but lets leave that aside, seems unrelated to this > > case) > > > > That will get built by... > > > > tools/perf/util/Build:libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86) += libunwind/x86_32.o > > > > [acme@jouet linux]$ grep CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86 /tmp/build/perf/.config-detected > > [acme@jouet linux]$ > > > > Ingo, are you doing something unusual as building a 32-bit perf to read a > > 62-bit perf.data file? > > > > Jiri, can you help here? Do you need more info? > > hum, looks like local unwind support wasn't compiled in for some reason > > Ingo, what's the arch of host and perf data? also "make clean && make VF=1 V=1" output would help thanks, jirka