From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752479AbdFUIXX (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 04:23:23 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:49340 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751038AbdFUIXT (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 04:23:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:23:01 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tom Lendacky , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Brijesh Singh , Toshimitsu Kani , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Matt Fleming , Alexander Potapenko , "H. Peter Anvin" , Larry Woodman , Jonathan Corbet , Joerg Roedel , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Ryabinin , Dave Young , Rik van Riel , Arnd Bergmann , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Andy Lutomirski , Boris Ostrovsky , Dmitry Vyukov , Juergen Gross , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/36] x86/mm: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Message-ID: <20170621082301.47lafavh6cstbwfl@pd.tnic> References: <20170616184947.18967.84890.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20170616185140.18967.61905.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:18:59AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > That looks wrong. It's not decrypted it's rather unencrypted, right? Yeah, it previous versions of the patchset, "decrypted" and "unencrypted" were both present so we settled on "decrypted" for the nomenclature. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.