From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752852AbdFVIbY (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2017 04:31:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com ([209.85.128.195]:33818 "EHLO mail-wr0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751116AbdFVIbW (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2017 04:31:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:31:18 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] some scheduler code movements Message-ID: <20170622083118.3ngmh27qg4x5kxho@gmail.com> References: <20170621182203.30626-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170621182203.30626-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > I've applied the first patch to the scheduler tree yesterday, but the other > > changes unfortunately conflicted with other pending scheduler work - could > > you please re-post the other 3 patches on top of tip:sched/core? > > Sure, here they are. Hm, what tree is this against? First patch won't apply to the latest tip:sched/core: patching file kernel/sched/core.c Hunk #7 succeeded at 5253 (offset -2 lines). Hunk #8 FAILED at 5285. Hunk #9 succeeded at 5581 (offset 1 line). Hunk #10 succeeded at 6485 (offset 1 line). 1 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/sched/core.c Thanks, Ingo