From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752071AbdF3D6u (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:58:50 -0400
Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:34954 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751776AbdF3D6s (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:58:48 -0400
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:28:44 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Find transition latency dynamically
Message-ID: <20170630035844.GW29665@vireshk-i7>
References: <8041a965fcca71231576ae77a141b1e4333a81cc.1496402967.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <20170629042836.GI29665@vireshk-i7>
 <CAJZ5v0gOq-XPcXFfbycQkWzobBktoH5=eLxYAdh_G33fu8L1cg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gOq-XPcXFfbycQkWzobBktoH5=eLxYAdh_G33fu8L1cg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 29-06-17, 22:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Shouldn't drivers do that really?

Well they can, but the we will have some sort of code duplication
then. Or else we can provide a helper for them to find this value
dynamically and that would be fine too. And maybe we can add a
callback for the cpufreq-driver, which can be filled by the generic
helper and core can call it once at policy initialization time.

-- 
viresh