From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751840AbdF3G7d (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 02:59:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:36092 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751532AbdF3G7b (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 02:59:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 08:59:26 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Last bits for initial 5-level paging enabling Message-ID: <20170630065926.fcwax3odtla4dp4t@gmail.com> References: <20170622122608.80435-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20170623090601.njsmucxdy4rev6zw@gmail.com> <20170623144915.4d6esghvicnczuaj@black.fi.intel.com> <20170629150657.urgapbzmf3jy6jgp@node.shutemov.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170629150657.urgapbzmf3jy6jgp@node.shutemov.name> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > Can I apply them in this order cleanly, without breaking bisection: > > > > > > > x86/mm: Rename tasksize_32bit/64bit to task_size_32bit/64bit > > > > x86/mpx: Do not allow MPX if we have mappings above 47-bit > > > > x86/mm: Prepare to expose larger address space to userspace > > > > x86/mm: Allow userspace have mapping above 47-bit > > > > x86: Enable 5-level paging support > > > > > > ? > > > > > > I.e. I'd like to move the first patch last. > > > > > > The reason is that we should first get all quirks and assumptions fixed, all > > > facilities implemented - and only then enable 5-level paging as a final step which > > > produces a well working kernel. > > > > > > (This should also make it slightly easier to analyze any potential regressions in > > > earlier patches.) > > > > Just checked bisectability with this order on allmodconfig -- works fine. > > Ingo, if there's no objections, can we get these applied? Just this week, which is the final week of the development window, we had two fixes for the 5-level pagetables commits, so we need to delay the rest to right after -rc1. Could you please resend them them (and any followup patches), in the suggested order? I don't see any conceptual problems, so this is only about timing and maximizing stability. Thanks, Ingo