From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752042AbdGEOKJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:10:09 -0400
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:52582 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751654AbdGEOKE (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:10:04 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,312,1496127600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="282379531"
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:10:18 +0800
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] x86: Fix the irq affinity in fixup_cpus
Message-ID: <20170705141018.GB17143@yu-desktop-1.sh.intel.com>
References: <1493020011-18536-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706042158160.3517@nanos>
 <20170703135109.GA26935@yu-desktop-1.sh.intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707041029200.9000@nanos>
 <20170705032052.GA10286@yu-desktop-1.sh.intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707050843380.2019@nanos>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707050843380.2019@nanos>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 08:46:08AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017, Chen Yu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:50:33AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Here's the test result for affinity:
> > # uname -r
> > 4.12.0+
> > # cat /proc/irq/32/smp_affinity
> > 00000000,80000000
> > # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu31/online 
> > # cat /proc/irq/32/smp_affinity
> > 00000000,ffffffff
> > Looks like cpu31 is till included in the irq mask.
> 
> Yes, because the offline broke affinity and now it's reset to the default
> affinity mask. /proc/irq/*/affinity is the affinity which is allowed by the
> admin, not the one which is effective.
> 
> Look at /proc/irq/32/effective_affinity to see where it's really routed to.
>
ok, got it, this is normal now.
cat /proc/irq/32/effective_affinity
00000000,00000001

Thanks,
	Yu