From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751817AbdGEQs6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:48:58 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:34985 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751680AbdGEQs5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:48:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 18:48:50 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ben Guthro Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Mike Galbraith , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Potential scheduler regression Message-ID: <20170705164850.lnziwloc6mko3mxo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 11:42:46AM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote: > Hello, > > I've been in the process of updating our kernel in our appliance VM > from an old LTS kernel (4.1.y) to something a bit more modern (4.9.y) > - and ran into a performance regression, when our QA team was running > some regression suites. > > > I bisect this behavior to the following commit, introduced in the 4.9 > merge window: > Could you test a later kernel that includes commit: 1ad3aaf3fcd2 ("sched/core: Implement new approach to scale select_idle_cpu()")