From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752631AbdGFBSi (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 5 Jul 2017 21:18:38 -0400
Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:36709 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752357AbdGFBSg (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 5 Jul 2017 21:18:36 -0400
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:18:44 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] printk for 4.13
Message-ID: <20170706011844.GC7195@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
References: <20170703142434.GV1538@pathway.suse.cz>
 <CA+55aFzu1KKJHfKtpeBkK7zSGMrzrUnkJhKEB2FJQ9HMb0VBLg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170706004404.GA7195@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <CA+55aFxXPnNo_tkKb-3iyeRb1Vugfcg=1z9vc7ZmYzxZb5237w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxXPnNo_tkKb-3iyeRb1Vugfcg=1z9vc7ZmYzxZb5237w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On (07/05/17 18:15), Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
> <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > PRINTK_NMI_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_MASK calls into vprintk_deferred(), which
> > does vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_SCHED, NULL, 0, fmt, args). and
> > vprintk_emit() LOGLEVEL_SCHED is nothing, but printk_deferred(), which
> > never calls into the scheduler and does not even try to lock console_sem.
> 
> Hmm. Ok. I think I see what you're saying. We're just adding it to the
> log buffer, but not actually going through the whole "lets see if we
> can push it further".

yep ;)

> So I will take another look tomorrow, right now I'm feeling a bit
> merged out for the day,

sure. thanks.

	-ss