From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753076AbdGFXbO (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2017 19:31:14 -0400 Received: from outbound-smtp09.blacknight.com ([46.22.139.14]:42433 "EHLO outbound-smtp09.blacknight.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752951AbdGFXbN (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2017 19:31:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 00:31:11 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Paul Moore Cc: Deepa Dinamani , Arnd Bergmann , Richard Guy Briggs , Tony Jones , LKML , linux-audit@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: Reduce overhead using a coarse clock Message-ID: <20170706233111.xa4ky5zob6rhf3uu@techsingularity.net> References: <20170704121143.rvxkmm4rpphbyfd7@techsingularity.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 04:25:48PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > >> > >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > Acked-by: Deepa Dinamani > > > > As already Arnd pointed out, your patch should be fine as that is how > > it was before my patch. Since nobody saw any problems before my patch, > > lower granularity should be fine. > > Agreed. Mel's patch basically restores the previous behavior while > keeping the 64-bit timestamp size. > > Considering where we are at with the merge window, I'm going to merge > this into the audit/next branch and not send this up to Linus during > the current window; while the patch is small, I like to give things > some time in linux-next before sending them up. That's completely fine, I knew the timing was off. Thanks for picking it up. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs