From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler changes for v4.13
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:45:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170710084533.bl6znx5g2owalbx6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90ca2c9c-5b48-44f2-a590-ae4e42a61376@gmail.com>
* Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/2017 01:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Linus,
> >
> > Please pull the latest sched-core-for-linus git tree from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched-core-for-linus
> >
> > # HEAD: 72298e5c92c50edd8cb7cfda4519483ce65fa166 sched/cputime: Refactor the cputime_adjust() code
> >
> > The main changes in this cycle were:
> >
> > - Add the SYSTEM_SCHEDULING bootup state to move various scheduler debug checks
> > earlier into the bootup. This turns silent and sporadically deadly bugs into
> > nice, deterministic splats. Fix some of the splats that triggered.
> > (Thomas Gleixner)
> >
> > - A round of restructuring and refactoring of the load-balancing and topology
> > code (Peter Zijlstra)
> >
> > - Another round of consolidating ~20 of incremental scheduler code history: this
> > time in terms of wait-queue nomenclature. (I didn't get much feedback on these
> > renaming patches, and we can still easily change any names I might have
> > misplaced, so if anyone hates a new name, please holler and I'll fix it.)
> > (Ingo Molnar)
>
> This commit ac6424b981bce1c4bc55675c6ce11bfe1bbfa64f ("sched/wait:
> Rename wait_queue_t => wait_queue_entry_t") ends up renaming the
> autofs_packet_missing, autofs_packet_expire_multi and autofs_v5_packet
> member previously named wait_queue_entry to wait_queue_entry_token. Was
> it intentional to force an user space build breakage when building
> against v4.13-rc headers for autofs headers?
Nope - mind sending a tested patch?
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-03 8:39 Ingo Molnar
2017-07-10 4:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-10 4:40 ` [PATCH] autofs: Revert wait_queue_t => wait_queue_entry_t rename Florian Fainelli
2017-07-10 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-07-10 8:52 ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-10 9:42 ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-10 14:01 ` Gabriel C
2017-07-10 15:52 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-10 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-10 23:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-10 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170710084533.bl6znx5g2owalbx6@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®