From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Diller <deller@gmx.de>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
"security@kernel.org" <security@kernel.org>,
Qualys Security Advisory <qsa@qualys.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ximin Luo <infinity0@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] exec: Use init rlimits for setuid exec
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:27:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170710162751.GC7071@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jK5m1pVSon=uGy=dLgVi89k33+Lm-XHZ4xiNY-QdUxtng@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon 10-07-17 09:12:11, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu 06-07-17 12:12:55, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Linus Torvalds
> >> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> (a) minimal: just use our existing default stack (and stack _only_)
> >> >>> limit value for suid binaries that actually get extra permissions: {
> >> >>> _STK_LIM, RLIM_INFINITY }.
> >> >>
> >> >> This would look a lot like the existing patch; it'd just not copy the
> >> >> init process rlimits.
> >> >
> >> > Can't we just do the final rlimit setting so late in execve that we
> >> > don't need that whole "saved_rlimit" thing?
> >>
> >> The stack rlimit defines the mmap layout too:
> >>
> >> do_execveat_common() ->
> >> exec_binprm() ->
> >> search_binary_handler() ->
> >> fmt->load_binary (load_elf_binary()) ->
> >> setup_new_exec() ->
> >> arch_pick_mmap_layout() ->
> >> mmap_is_legacy() ->
> >> rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK) == RLIM_INFINITY
> >
> > FWIW this is gone in tip tree. See
> > lkml.kernel.org/r/20170614082218.12450-1-mhocko@kernel.org
>
> Sounds good to me, but won't large-memory users in 32-bit get annoyed?
Why would they? 32b do bottom up layouts by default.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 4:32 Kees Cook
2017-07-06 4:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-07-06 12:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-06 15:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-07-06 5:47 ` Willy Tarreau
2017-07-06 12:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-06 15:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-07-06 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-06 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-06 17:29 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-06 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-06 19:12 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-07 4:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-07-07 5:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-07 5:10 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-07 5:15 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-07 5:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-07-07 5:45 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-07 6:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-07 6:10 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-07 16:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-07 18:28 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-07 14:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-07-07 5:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-07 5:49 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-07 6:40 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-07 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-07 18:27 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-10 8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:12 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-10 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-10 16:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2017-07-10 16:27 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-07-10 18:16 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 18:29 ` Rik van Riel
2017-07-12 23:50 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170710162751.GC7071@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=infinity0@debian.org \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=qsa@qualys.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®