From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
"open list:LOCKING PRIMITIVES" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtmutex: remove unnecessary adjust prio
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:35:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170712163537.7ipr27jmvxmwjfqt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170712101449.26b47984@gandalf.local.home>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:14:49AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:39:24 +0800
> Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > Any comments for this little change? It's passed on 0day testing.
>
> I think the problem was that this was a third patch after two
> documentation patches. Where, people put documentation review at the
> bottom of their priority list.
>
> This should have been sent as separate patch on its own.
My problem was the sparse changelog, which forces me to think hard and
thus is landed on the 'later' queue, which moves at glacial speeds.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-12 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-07 2:52 [PATCH v4 1/3] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design Alex Shi
2017-07-07 2:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rtmutex: update rt-mutex Alex Shi
2017-07-11 14:37 ` Alex Shi
2017-07-07 2:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] rtmutex: remove unnecessary adjust prio Alex Shi
2017-07-11 14:39 ` Alex Shi
2017-07-12 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-12 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-07-13 6:13 ` Alex Shi
2017-07-13 6:12 ` Alex Shi
2017-07-11 14:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design Alex Shi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-25 5:26 [PATCH v3 " Alex Shi
2017-05-25 5:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] rtmutex: remove unnecessary adjust prio Alex Shi
2017-06-20 0:40 ` Alex Shi
2017-04-13 14:02 [RFC PATCH 0/3] rtmutex comments update and trival fix Alex Shi
2017-04-13 14:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] rtmutex: remove unnecessary adjust prio Alex Shi
2017-04-13 16:15 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170712163537.7ipr27jmvxmwjfqt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®