From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] perf annotate: Use the sample period when calculating the percentage
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:23:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170718162344.GC12241@danjae.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499967980-15718-1-git-send-email-treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:46:20AM +0900, Taeung Song wrote:
> Currently the percentages of perf-annotate are calculated
> with number of samples, not the sample period.
> So fix it to correspond with perf-report using the sample period
> for the calculation.
Not sure someone still wants the old behavior. Maybe it'd be better
to honor --show-nr-samples option.
>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index d9bdedf..28a6d11 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ double disasm__calc_percent(struct annotation *notes, int evidx, s64 offset,
> if (h->total_samples) {
It seems checking total_period here is clearer and safer. But I guess
it would have same effect 99.9% but still..
> sample->nr_samples = hits;
> sample->period = p;
> - percent = 100.0 * hits / h->total_samples;
> + percent = 100.0 * p / h->total_period;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1730,8 +1730,9 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
> start = map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->start);
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> - u64 offset, nr_samples;
> + u64 offset;
> double percent_max = 0.0;
> + struct sym_hist_entry sample;
>
> src_line->nr_pcnt = nr_pcnt;
>
> @@ -1739,15 +1740,15 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
> double percent = 0.0;
>
> h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx + k);
> - nr_samples = h->addr[i].nr_samples;
> + sample = h->addr[i];
>
> if (h->total_samples)
Ditto.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> - percent = 100.0 * nr_samples / h->total_samples;
> + percent = 100.0 * sample.period / h->total_period;
>
> if (percent > percent_max)
> percent_max = percent;
> src_line->samples[k].percent = percent;
> - src_line->samples[k].nr = nr_samples;
> + src_line->samples[k].nr = sample.nr_samples;
> }
>
> if (percent_max <= 0.5)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-18 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-13 17:46 Taeung Song
2017-07-18 16:23 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2017-07-19 17:34 ` Taeung Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170718162344.GC12241@danjae.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=treeze.taeung@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome