mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 8/9] cpufreq: Add CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING cpufreq driver flag
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:30:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170719163054.GA32233@light.dominikbrodowski.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af15ad23b687e819919eeea687ff44bb37b8e9df.1500373914.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]


On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:42:48PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The policy->transition_latency field is used for multiple purposes
> today and its not straight forward at all. This is how it is used:
> 
> A. Set the correct transition_latency value.
> 
> B. Set it to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL because:
>    1. We don't want automatic dynamic switching (with
>       ondemand/conservative) to happen at all.
>    2. We don't know the transition latency.
> 
> This patch handles the B.1. case in a more readable way. A new flag for
> the cpufreq drivers is added to disallow use of cpufreq governors which
> have dynamic_switching flag set.
> 
> All the current cpufreq drivers which are setting transition_latency
> unconditionally to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL are updated to use it. They don't
> need to set transition_latency anymore.
> 
> There shouldn't be any functional change after this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Looks good to me, so feel free to add:

	Reviewed-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>

Best,
	Dominik

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-19 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-19 10:12 [PATCH V3 0/9] cpufreq: transition-latency cleanups Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 1/9] cpufreq: governor: Drop min_sampling_rate Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 2/9] cpufreq: Use transition_delay_us for legacy governors as well Viresh Kumar
2017-07-24 16:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-28  4:48     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 3/9] cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay value to 10 ms Viresh Kumar
2017-07-25 11:54   ` Leonard Crestez
2017-07-26  0:19     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-07-26  6:06     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-27 16:54       ` Leonard Crestez
2017-07-28  5:28         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-08-01 17:48           ` Leonard Crestez
2017-08-02  3:23             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-08-16  6:34           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-08-16  9:42             ` Leonard Crestez
2017-08-17  3:38               ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 4/9] cpufreq: Don't set transition_latency for setpolicy drivers Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 5/9] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Make ->get_transition_latency() mandatory Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 6/9] cpufreq: Replace "max_transition_latency" with "dynamic_switching" Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 7/9] cpufreq: schedutil: Set dynamic_switching to true Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 8/9] cpufreq: Add CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING cpufreq driver flag Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 16:30   ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2017-07-19 10:12 ` [PATCH V3 9/9] cpufreq: Allow dynamic switching with CPUFREQ_ETERNAL latency Viresh Kumar
2017-07-19 12:42 ` [PATCH V3 0/9] cpufreq: transition-latency cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170719163054.GA32233@light.dominikbrodowski.net \
    --to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®