From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933124AbdGSQe7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:34:59 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f194.google.com ([209.85.216.194]:33492 "EHLO mail-qt0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754249AbdGSQe5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:34:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:34:53 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mingo@redhat.com, longman@redhat.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, luto@amacapital.net, efault@gmx.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, guro@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support Message-ID: <20170719163453.GQ3365493@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> References: <20170717020721.3612468-1-tj@kernel.org> <20170717020721.3612468-6-tj@kernel.org> <20170717141409.sqafufjupsiffnri@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170717142609.GC3519177@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20170718172801.f56273tzgzn3xkne@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170718175456.GH585283@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20170718184135.auf6d2clsdxseka3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170718184714.GA3365493@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20170719140728.3mcg6uemqyy5muc4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170719140728.3mcg6uemqyy5muc4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Peter. On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:07:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 02:47:14PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Were there other things that caught your eyes? > > I didn't immediately see the point of "domain (threaded" output, and I I'll probably drop the parens but I think it's meaningful to show the state to userland as it affects what users can and can't do. > think it might be useful to have a "threaded" column in /proc/cgroups. Will add that. We *might* want cgroup.controllers_threaded too but we can think about that later. > But no, I've been over this a few times now and I think we're good. > > Yes, I think we can work with this. Thanks! Awesome. I'll update the patchset. Thanks a lot for the inputs and patience! -- tejun