From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752910AbdGUM3K (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:29:10 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:59528 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751748AbdGUM3J (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:29:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:28:57 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Mikulas Patocka Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ML Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c: don't apply the lahf_lm workaround in a hypervisor Message-ID: <20170721122857.GA5036@nazgul.tnic> References: <20170712134706.GA20584@nazgul.tnic> <20170713063203.GA29024@nazgul.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 07:34:59AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > (and I can't use kernels newer that 4.4 on the host machine because of > broken hibernation) And what do we do with upstream patches which we need in older kernels? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --