mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	kernel-team@lge.com, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] perf annotate: Fix wrong --show-total-period option showing number of samples
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 07:46:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170722224605.GA2559@danjae.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170721144748.GF4134@kernel.org>

Hi Arnaldo and Taeung,

(+ Andi)

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:47:48AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 06:36:55AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> > @@ -177,14 +177,12 @@ static int perf_evsel__add_sample(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> >  	 */
> >  	process_branch_stack(sample->branch_stack, al, sample);
> >  
> > -	sample->period = 1;
> >  	sample->weight = 1;
> > -
> >  	he = hists__add_entry(hists, al, NULL, NULL, NULL, sample, true);
> >  	if (he == NULL)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> I split the hunk above into a separate patch, as a fix, Namhyung, can
> you take a look at why need to unconditionally overwrite what is in
> sample->weight as well?
> 
> Looks fishy as it may come with a value from the kernel, parsed in
> perf_evsel__parse_sample(), when PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT is in
> perf_event_attr->sample_type.
> 
> Is it that the hists code needs a sane value when PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT
> isn't requested in sample_type?

It was Andi added that code originally (05484298cbfe).  IIUC the
weight is only meaningful for some CPUs with Intel TSX and he used a
dummy value.

AFAIK the hists code doesn't care of it unless weight sort key is used
(for report).  As it's not used by annotate code, I think it'd be
better leaving it as is (like period).

Thanks,
Namhyung


> 
> The resulting cset is below.
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 
> commit a935e8cd8d5d4b7936c4b4cf27c2d0e87d1a6a66
> Author: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
> Date:   Fri Jul 21 11:38:48 2017 -0300
> 
>     perf annotate: Do not overwrite sample->period
>     
>     In fixing the --show-total-period option it was noticed that the value
>     of sample->period was being overwritten, fix it.
>     
>     Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
>     Cc: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
>     Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>     Fixes: fd36f3dd7933 ("perf hist: Pass struct sample to __hists__add_entry()")
>     [ split from a larger patch, added the Fixes tag ]
>     Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> index 96fe1a88c1e5..7e33278eff67 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ static int perf_evsel__add_sample(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>  	 */
>  	process_branch_stack(sample->branch_stack, al, sample);
>  
> -	sample->period = 1;
>  	sample->weight = 1;
>  
>  	he = hists__add_entry(hists, al, NULL, NULL, NULL, sample, true);

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-22 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-19 21:36 Taeung Song
2017-07-20 19:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-21  9:41   ` Taeung Song
2017-07-21 11:24     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-24  1:51       ` Taeung Song
2017-07-24 17:37         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-24 21:28           ` Taeung Song
2017-07-25 14:42             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-25 15:53               ` Taeung Song
2017-07-25 16:17                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-26 11:57                   ` Taeung Song
2017-07-26 20:17                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-27 15:14                       ` Taeung Song
2017-07-26 17:27             ` [tip:perf/core] perf annotate stdio: Fix column header when using --show-total-period tip-bot for Taeung Song
2017-07-21 14:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] perf annotate: Fix wrong --show-total-period option showing number of samples Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-22 22:46   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2017-07-23 15:46     ` Andi Kleen
2017-07-24 17:34       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-24 17:46         ` Andi Kleen
2017-07-24 18:07           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-26 17:20 ` [tip:perf/core] perf hists: Pass perf_sample to __symbol__inc_addr_samples() tip-bot for Taeung Song
2017-07-26 17:20 ` [tip:perf/core] perf annotate: Store the sample period in each histogram bucket tip-bot for Taeung Song
2017-07-26 17:20 ` [tip:perf/core] perf annotate: Do not overwrite sample->period tip-bot for Taeung Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170722224605.GA2559@danjae.aot.lge.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
    --cc=treeze.taeung@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®