From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932347AbdGXQil (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:38:41 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:33640 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752649AbdGXQid (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:38:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 18:37:54 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Kani, Toshimitsu" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mchehab@s-opensource.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac Message-ID: <20170724163754.GA18184@nazgul.tnic> References: <1500654661.2042.49.camel@hpe.com> <20170721140131.40079805@vento.lan> <20170721172344.GA11316@nazgul.tnic> <1500661773.2042.53.camel@hpe.com> <20170722062853.GA2050@nazgul.tnic> <1500907209.2042.55.camel@hpe.com> <20170724150432.GA31295@nazgul.tnic> <1500909372.2042.58.camel@hpe.com> <20170724153716.GA17708@nazgul.tnic> <1500911226.2042.60.camel@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1500911226.2042.60.camel@hpe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:56:27PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > Yes, Mauro has already pointed this out. As I replied to him, we do > have a separate series of platforms that do not have built-in RAS, and So this whitelist entry +static struct acpi_oemlist oemlist[] = { + {"HPE ", "Server ", 0, ACPI_SIG_FADT, all_versions}, + { } /* End */ +}; looks like it'll match every HP server platform not only the ones with built-in RAS. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --