From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752518AbdHBSu3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:50:29 -0400
Received: from mail-qt0-f170.google.com ([209.85.216.170]:33848 "EHLO
        mail-qt0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752398AbdHBSu1 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:50:27 -0400
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 11:50:24 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        kernel-team@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] cgroup: re-use the parent pointer in
 cgroup_destroy_locked()
Message-ID: <20170802185023.GL2311718@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
References: <20170802165532.22277-1-guro@fb.com>
 <20170802165532.22277-5-guro@fb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170802165532.22277-5-guro@fb.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:55:32PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> As we already have a pointer to the parent cgroup in
> cgroup_destroy_locked(), we don't need to calculate it again
> to pass as an argument for cgroup1_check_for_release().

Except for the minor nit earlier, everything in the series looks good
to me.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun